Lawmakers and advocates say a new Delaware Supreme Court rule that allows tenants to be represented by non-lawyer advocates in eviction proceedings will create parity with landlords and mitigate some of the most harmful effects of housing insecurity.
Opponents, including the Delaware Apartment Association, the non-profit group that represents the interests of multi-family rental unit landlords, say efforts and money would be better spent in the form of direct rental assistance.
For the Supreme Court’s rule change to have its full intended effect depends on the passage and signing of a bill thatâs been held up in the House of Representatives since before the legislature recessed in June 2021.
Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 101, sponsored by Sen. Bryan Townsend, D-Brookside, would guarantee the right to counsel in landlord/tenant actions for households that fall below 200 percent of the federal poverty line.Â
âThe bill tries to focus on those most in economic need,â Townsend said in an interview with Delaware/Town Square LIVE News. âThe reason for it is because there’s a vastly disproportionate percentage of instances in which the landlord has legal counsel or an experienced advocate in court to represent the interests of the landlord, but the tenant does not have legal counsel at all.â
Indeed, according to the ACLU of Delaware, 86% of landlords retain legal representation in court eviction proceedings while, on average, only 2% of renters have representation.Â
âThereâs a sort of inherent unfairness to that,â Townsend said. âIf you happen to be one of the very few tenants who has access to counsel and you walk into court and you’re sitting there waiting for your proceeding to begin, and you look over and there’s another tenant without legal counsel — well, itâs very likely that the two of you are going to walk out of the courthouse with quite different outcomes.â
The ACLU similarly found that when renters are represented in court, they are twice as likely to remain housed.
While the legal disputes in question deal with landlords and tenants, Townsend argues that everyone pays the price when families face housing instability.
âHaving stable housing is so key to all kinds of other stabilities and prosperities in our community, not just for the individual tenant, but the overall community,â he said. Public health and criminal justice concerns skyrocket when housing insecurity is entered into the equation, he said.
Debra Burgos, president of the Delaware Apartment Association, said in an interview with Delaware/Town Square LIVE News that her group doesnât feel that Senate Bill 101 will prevent evictions.
âMost of the cases that we are dealing with in landlord-tenant cases are essentially nonpayment of rent,â Burgos explained. âIn those kinds of cases, there’s really not much an attorney can do to prevent that. Housing and rental assistance are the best ways to keep someone who can’t pay their rent in their home.â
By extending the eviction process, Burgos fears tenants will be left with higher debts and higher judgments while landlords pay a price that, for many, can be financially ruining.Â
âLandlords, big and small, have mortgages, we have maintenance costs, we have utilities that have to be paid and that doesn’t go away because a resident isn’t paying their rent,â Burgos said. âThat’s not something that I can tell the bank — âI can’t pay the mortgage this month because several people are waiting for their court date.ââ
She said that the costs of even lengthier court proceedings could force landlords to increase rent or have less money to spend on maintenance.
âCOVID has added a whole bunch of additional layers of expenses and costs for landlords that are often overlooked or minimized because of that concept that there’s unlimited funding,â Burgos said.Â
âWe do our best to maintain safe and affordable housing, but we are impacted by so many different factors, whether it’s the clean water legislation thatâs coming down the pike, when water or sewer bills increase — that’s just additional expenses that most landlords are having to take on.â
Senate Bill 101 would also bar landlords from filing for evictions when less than $500 is owed by the tenant.Â
That doesnât mean landlords couldnât seek to recover those costs, but they would not be able to evict a tenant over that debt.
There are exceptions, Townsend explained.Â
âYou can’t keep doing that over and over and over again,â he said. âThere’s a limited number of times over a few years period that youâre able to do that, and that’s trying to strike the fair balance between landlords and tenants where if you are a tenant that is constantly behind and constantly causing costs or uncertainties for the landlord, well, then that’s also unfair to the landlord.â
Burgos said landlords should not be forced into the position of âlending moneyâ when they are trying to enforce a signed, legally binding contract.
âYou are essentially forcing landlords into becoming lenders,â she said. âYou are now required to lend out this money and you have no recourse to retrieve it, which really is problematic. We move people in, we sign a contract for rent and rent is due. Having the legislature come in and prevent a landlord from collecting all the rent that is owed under a contract is a major concern for us.â
Sen. Colin Bonini, R-Little Creek, voted against Senate Bill 101 when it was considered in the Senate.Â
Bonini said in an interview with Delaware/Town Square LIVE News that he voted against the bill because heâs worried about the precedent it sets. Heâs not sure if itâs actually whatâs best for tenants, and heâs afraid it disadvantages landlords, many of whom are not extraordinarily wealthy people.Â
âAre taxpayers going to be required to start providing legal counsel for every single private contract,â Bonini asked. âI think if nonprofits and good-hearted people want to provide representation for those folks, that’s fine. I just think mandating that taxpayers have to pay for it is a dangerous precedent.â
Heâs also concerned that in some cases, eviction proceedings could become held up in courts for long periods of time during which tenants would continue accumulating back-rent to their own detriment.
âThe assumption that adding attorneys to the mix lessens complexity or adds efficiency just doesn’t make any sense at all,â Bonini said. âRegardless of how well-intentioned, we need to be careful about what the real-world consequences are.âÂ
The rule change comes as a backlog of eviction cases makes its way through Delaware courts following early-pandemic eviction moratoriums and a rocky rollout of federal rental assistance by the Delaware State Housing Authority.
With the CDCâs eviction moratorium having ended in August 2021, many experts and advocates expected that Delaware would see an immediate increase in eviction filings. That hasnât panned out.Â
According to Eviction Lab, which tracks filings in Delaware and compares the data to pre-pandemic figures, since March 15, 2020, there have been 13,313 eviction filings â markedly less than the 18,000 filings that occurred in 2019.Â
John Whitelaw, advocacy director for the Community Legal Aid Society of Delaware, said the Supreme Courtâs new rule will make the tenants’ chances of getting fair results better because âif you are represented, you do better.âÂ
âThat’s why this is important,â Whitelaw said. âBecause it will allow tenants to be represented in a way that parallels how landlords are represented.â
Landlords have long been able to be represented by non-lawyer advocates in Justice of the Peace Courts thanks to Supreme Court Rule 57. That rule gives artificial entities — most commonly limited liability corporations — the ability to be represented by non-attorney advocates or Form 50 agents.Â
Landlords often set up LLCs to conduct their business and are therefore able to take advantage of Rule 57âs provisions.
âBut tenants — in the residential sense as opposed to commercial sense — are never artificial entities and a landlord is never going to rent to a tenant as an artificial entity,â Whitelaw said. âSo even though the provision is mirrored, it only could ever apply one way in reality, so the tenants either have a choice of representing themselves or getting a lawyer.â
That changes with Rule 57.1, which allows non-lawyer advocates to represent tenants free of charge to the tenant and under the supervision of a legal aid attorney.Â
âThis is not just an invitation for anybody to go set up shop and say, âcome to me and I’ll be your tenant representative in J.P. Court,â Whitelaw said. âIt’s being effectively regulated to protect tenant interests and to make sure that they’re not subject to being exploited and abused.â
The non-lawyer advocates will be known as QTAs or qualified tenant advocates. Under the rule, to be a QTA one must be employed by one of the three legal aid agencies in Delaware, including the Community Legal Aid Society, the Legal Services Corporation of Delaware or Delaware Volunteer Legal Services.
The QTA may not charge a tenant for their services and must be qualified through a certification program designed by the legal aid agencies. Normal confidentiality privileges will remain, clients will have to certify that they agree to be represented and QTAs will be supervised by an attorney from the legal aid agency.
âWe’re only going to send people who are qualified, and we’re not going to send them in every case,â Whitelaw said. âThere are cases where you need to have a lawyer involved, either because the other side has a lawyer or they’re more complicated or messy, so we’re obviously going to be thoughtful and careful about when the QTAs get sent in.â
Whitelaw said he thinks the Supreme Courtâs adoption of Rule 57.1 was a thoughtful response to a real need that will provide necessary representation in a financially efficient way.
Thatâs important as it relates to Senate Bill 101 which, according to its fiscal note, is expected to cost $3.2 million annually by the time it gets up and running.
That fiscal note, though, assumes attorney fees of $100 per hour for eight hours per client.Â
âLet me just be blunt about it — it is obviously much less expensive to have this work done by someone who isn’t an attorney in those cases where it’s appropriate,â Whitelaw said. âLawyers cost more and that’s just the way it is right? The costs for an attorney are going to be higher than the costs for QTAs and so we’ll be able to provide more services through QTAs.â
In order to have its full effect, Whitelaw explained, the rule depends almost entirely on the passage of Townsendâs bill.Â
âIf Senate Bill 101 doesn’t pass and when the money that is currently available to expand tenant representation ends, this will be of marginal value,â he said. âWhile this will make it more doable, absolutely, the big-picture problem will not get fully addressed until there is sufficient funding available so that the legal aid programs collectively have enough money to hire enough people to represent low- to moderate-income tenants who have eviction cases filed against them.â
The Community Legal Aid Society is âabsolutely thrilled with the rule change,â he said. âThis is an innovative move by the Supreme Court in the face of eviction crisis that has been around for a while and has really come to the publicâs and policymakersâ attention throughout this pandemic.â
According to Eviction Lab, eviction filings in January 2022 were down 46% compared to the pre-pandemic average for the month of January.
However, âthere are still way too many eviction cases being filed,â Whitelaw said. âWay too many people are getting evicted and there is an eviction crisis that existed before COVID that was absolutely exacerbated by COVID and is now under a spotlight.â
âIs this rule change going to fix the eviction crisis,â he asked. âNo; the only thing that will fix the eviction crisis is a lot more affordable housing, obviously, but the Supreme Court can’t fix that problem.â
Townsend said that while Senate Bill 101 will help tenants fare better in court, itâs not at all designed to hurt landlords.Â
âLandlords have private property rights — there’s no doubt about that,â he said.
But Bonini said that while he believes Townsendâs motives are honorable, he doesnât agree that Senate Bill 101 will help landlords.Â
âYou know, landlords aren’t necessarily bad folks — they just want you to pay rent,â Bonini said. âVery rarely are the landlords trying to hurt the tenants. â
Burgos said that landlords are in the business of keeping tenants in their homes and, in most cases, only resort to eviction when itâs absolutely necessary.
âI want someone in their apartment, I want them paying rent and if there’s no lease violation problems or extenuating circumstances, I don’t want to evict them either,â Burgos said. âUltimately, landlords have bills to pay too, so if they’re not able to pay rent, they do have to move forward.â
Bonini thinks that one unintended consequence of the legislation could be âmassive consolidations wherein the only people who will be able to afford to rent homes are big corporate players,â he said. âWe might be forcing small guys out of the market because they can’t afford all this litigation.â
Burgos said she hopes the legislature comes up with a “better solution” to the eviction problem.
âWe really wish that this money was going towards rental assistance,â she said. âIt’s really been a godsend through COVID for many of our residents to have that funding and eventually that will go away.â
RELATED STORIES:
Pickleball club 'Dill Dinkers' celebrates grand opening with ribbon cutting
04/23/2025Final curtain approaches for âThe SpongeBob Musicalâ at Delaware Childrenâs Theatre
04/23/2025NCC Finance Committee proposes local tax on recreational marijuana
04/23/2025Delaware Education Secretary appoints key leaders ahead of major school funding overhaul
04/23/2025Charlie Megginson covers government and politics for Town Square LIVE News. Reach him at (302) 344-8293 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @cmegginson4.
Share this Post